Received: |
by LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.5) with spool
id 562818 for [log in to unmask]; Sat, 20 May 2006
16:53:22 -0400
from web34201.mail.mud.yahoo.com by listserv.dartmouth.edu (LSMTP for
Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id < [log in to unmask]>;
Sat, 20 May 2006 16:53:22 -0400
(qmail 84038 invoked by uid 60001); 20 May 2006 20:53:22 -0000
from [74.12.79.227] by web34201.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 20
May 2006 16:53:22 EDT |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 20 May 2006 16:53:22 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Subject: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you for your interesting and scholarly responses
to my unscholarly question.
I also don't much like the claim of a connection
between 'tan'gun' and 'tengri;' to my unspecialist ear
it reeks of a false etymology dignified by degrees in
history. I think that both Altaic and, especially,
Turco-Mongolic, would be huge improvements (making the
sentence slightly less wrong, in any case), and have
so suggested that one of the two words be used instead
of Tungusic. Xiongnu would possibly be better, but I
don't think much of my chances in carrying that point,
even if I felt secure in the field of historical
linguistics.
Yours sincerely,
Adam Bohnet
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
|