SAHALIYAN Archives

May 2006, Week 3

SAHALIYAN@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH>EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pamela Crossley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sahaliyan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 May 2006 15:40:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
If I'm understand Beckwith's disassociation of Koguryo(ic) and  
Japanese from other Altaic languages, does this imply that Tungusic  
languages are only in some incidental way connected to "Altaic"  
languages at all? Does it mean that if there is an Altaic family it  
really has only two branches --Turkic and Mongolic? Does it leave the  
Tungusic languages as a free-standing language group?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2