SAHALIYAN Archives

May 2006, Week 3

SAHALIYAN@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH>EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v750)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
References:
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 May 2006 15:40:01 -0400
X-Originating-IP:
68.169.196.174
Subject:
is "Tungusic" part of "Altaic" anyway?
Reply-To:
Sahaliyan <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Pamela Crossley <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
Sahaliyan <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Received:
by LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.5) with spool id 550517 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 19 May 2006 15:40:03 -0400 from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net by listserv.dartmouth.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 19 May 2006 15:40:03 -0400 from [68.169.196.174] (helo=[192.168.1.7]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FhApP-0005xG-JY for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 19 May 2006 15:40:03 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer:
Apple Mail (2.750)
X-ELNK-Trace:
56beb36e50ae7352f79872ef0cac535e239a348a220c260929eb3a44af536187b7db2e0e37b1c4e83ca473d225a0f487350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
If I'm understand Beckwith's disassociation of Koguryo(ic) and  
Japanese from other Altaic languages, does this imply that Tungusic  
languages are only in some incidental way connected to "Altaic"  
languages at all? Does it mean that if there is an Altaic family it  
really has only two branches --Turkic and Mongolic? Does it leave the  
Tungusic languages as a free-standing language group?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2