Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 19 May 2006 11:24:26 -0700 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think it's an interesting possibility, and some of the cognates he proposes may indeed be historically related, but it does not necessarily prove that Na-Dené and Yeniseian are sister families. A number of Americanists are even weary of calling Na-Dené a cohesive language family, so going beyond that in my opinion, is walking on shaky ground.
- Andrew
Pamela Crossley <[log in to unmask]> wrote: oh andrew, i can't resist asking --what do you think of the ruhlen article in human biology on ket and na-dene?
On May 19, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Andrew E Shimunek wrote:
It seems I put the wrong date on Vovin's article. Here is the correct bibliographic info:
Vovin, Alexander (2000) "Did the Xiong-nu speak a Yeniseian language?", Central Asiatic Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 87-104.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
|