SAHALIYAN Archives

May 2006, Week 3

SAHALIYAN@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH>EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew E Shimunek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sahaliyan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 May 2006 11:24:26 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1091 bytes) , text/html (1599 bytes)
I think it's an interesting possibility, and some of the cognates he  proposes may indeed be historically related, but it does not  necessarily prove that Na-Dené and Yeniseian are sister families. A  number of Americanists are even weary of calling Na-Dené a cohesive  language family, so going beyond that in my opinion, is walking on  shaky ground.
  
  - Andrew

Pamela Crossley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:  oh andrew, i can't resist asking --what do you think of the ruhlen article in human biology on ket and na-dene? 




On May 19, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Andrew E Shimunek wrote:

It seems I put the wrong date on Vovin's article. Here is the correct bibliographic info:
  
  Vovin, Alexander (2000) "Did the Xiong-nu speak a Yeniseian language?", Central Asiatic Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 87-104.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2