NISUS Archives

October 2012

NISUS@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
jem cabanes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:23:49 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1121 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)

I have exactly the same problem. Actually I had to send my message twice because of this, as the first, to [log in to unmask] was rejected as you say.

jem c.
[log in to unmask]

On 13.10.2012, at 10.24, Žorvaršur Davķšsson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 
> In the past I could always use the following email addresses interchangeably
> 
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> 
> Now suddenly posts that use the address 
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> are sent back to me with this comment:
> 
> 
>   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <[log in to unmask]>
>    (reason: 550 5.0.0 <[log in to unmask]>... No "nisus" in name directory)
> (…)
> 
> 
> The address <[log in to unmask]> still seems to work, BUT *replying* to a message is not possible, because the Reply-To field still carries the address <[log in to unmask]>. In other words, one has to EDIT the mail and replace *manually* the automatically inserted [log in to unmask] with <[log in to unmask]>.
> 
> 
> Has anyone else noticed this? What is happening here?
> 
> 
> Žorvaršur



ATOM RSS1 RSS2