 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 23 May 2006 01:28:29 +0100 |
| In-Reply-To: |
<p06230903c097d965d167@[192.168.2.2]> |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 11:14 pm +0200 22/5/06, Emmanuel wrote:
>At 6:04 PM +0100 5/22/06, John Delacour wrote:
>>At 9:59 am -0400 22/5/06, Duane L. Mitchell wrote:
>>
>>>The negative didn't make sense, it would suggest that something is
>>>wrong with the "current date".
>>
>>Does this work? :
>>
>>set _GMT to date (do shell script "date +'%e %b %Y %H:%M:%S'")
>
>Yes but (for whoever might be concerned) it's much slower: 20+ms
>OMM, while the whole "tell current date" thing runs in 0.2 ms (100
>times less.)
Maybe; but if, as Duane suggests, something is wrong with 'current
date' on the Intel machines, then ...
JD
|
|
|
