Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 3 Nov 1999 08:04:15 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Forwarded Message from "Jerry and Carolyn Dean" <[log in to unmask]> ---
>From: "Jerry and Carolyn Dean" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: "Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: #5296 Technology and Enhanced Student Learning
>Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:54:38 -0600
------------------
You can't - impossible.
But remember - Was anyone ever asked to
justify use of the ball-point pen?
Did someone have to prove that typewriters
increased performance?
That was the leading technology of its day...
-----Original Message-----
From: LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 1:06 PM
Subject: #5296 Technology and Enhanced
Student Learning
>--- Forwarded Message from "Jorth, Cindy"
<[log in to unmask]> ---
>
>>From: "Jorth, Cindy" <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: "'LLTI-Editor'"
<[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: Technology and Enhanced Student
Learning
>>Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 15:56:20 -0800
>
>Hello all,
>
>I have been asked to answer the following
question from the Provost.
>
> "How have instructors integrated
technology into their teaching, and
>does the use of technology enhance
student learning?" I.e. Whether
>or not the use of the technology
> enhances student learning in some
measurable and discernable way.
>
>The first half of the question is easy
enough, it's the second half that
>gets murky. As we all know, there's still
much research still needed to
>actually correlate technology with improved
student learning. Any ideas on
>where I could start with this? I've been
asked to make this determination
>for the entire College of Humanities and
Fine Arts, not just for my
>Department of Foreign Languages and
Literatures.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Cindy
>
|
|
|