Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:11:47 -0400 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve, thanks for knocking the blinders off! I don't know why I didn't
see it, but I don't really need to use the concatenated field
anyplace. I can instead use the 'person' ID number as the match field
and determine 'current' status by inspection of the appropriate field
to make sure I am looking only at current records. Auto-creation works
fine now, and I don't have to put up with a kludgy fix to accomplish
related record creation.
Thanks so much for the help.
Barrie
On Mar 14, 2010, at 6:00 PM, FMPRO-L automatic digest system wrote:
> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:35:25 +0000
> From: Steve Cassidy <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: FMPRO-L Digest - 12 Mar 2010 to 13 Mar 2010 (#2010-42)
>
> On Mar 14, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Barrie Phillips wrote:
>
>> Thanks Steve
>>
>> I'm typing into a text field. In this case the portal to the
>> related =20=
>
>> table contains only
>> a text field, two date fields, and a check box that are visible.
>> The =20=
>
>> 'person' ID number,
>> current record flag (yes/no) and the concatenation of the two (the
>> =20
>> match field)
>> are hidden beneath the four entry fields.
>
> "Allow creation of related records" does not work if the match field
> =20
> is a calculation. (Obvious if you consider the situation; in order
> for =20=
>
> auto-creation to work, Filemaker has to set the match field =96 but
> a =20=
>
> calculation cannot be set.)
>
> I'm not 100% certain, because I rarely use this functionality, but I
> =20
> think you can get around the problem by using multiple (two in this
> =20
> case) relational criteria =96 one matching the person ID and the
> other =20=
>
> matching the flag =96 instead of the single calculated field.
>
> Steve=
|
|
|