= = = = = =<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Chuck Pelto <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:[log in to unmask]"><a href="/scripts/wa.exe?LOGON=A3%3Dind1005A%26L%3DFMPRO-L%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D20783%26B%3D--0016e64f5de42810e40485a2675d%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1%26pending%3D" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a>&gt;</span> wrote:<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">That&#39;s QUITE a litany of issues.</div>
<br>
I&#39;m surprised at the lack of support for iPv6. That&#39;s been around for quite some time and although it is not as widely accepted as I think it SHOULD be, I would have thought FMI would be more proactive. Oh....wait....I&#39;d forgotten about all the thinks they should have added back in FMP3 days.....&lt;heavy sigh&gt;....</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div> = = = = = =</div><div>Richard observes:</div><div><br></div><div>I have no inside technical knowledge, so I&#39;ll let somebody who does give a definitive answer to this, but it&#39;s possible that FMI would have had to fiddle with the basic &quot;.FP7&quot; file format to include IP6 compatibility. I for one am delighted that they&#39;ve been able to make &quot;.FP7&quot; last as long as they have, and it would take a lot more than IP6 compatibility to make me want to have to deal with a new file format.</div>
</div>