--- Forwarded Message from Judy Shoaf <[log in to unmask]> --- >Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:19:04 -0400 >From: Judy Shoaf <[log in to unmask]> >User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 >To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: Re: #7954 Rationale for digital language lab systems >References: <[log in to unmask]> >In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> We invested in the system because our old cassette audio lab was both heavily used for classes and testing, and failing, so a replacement was justified, and digital seemed to be the right move. Judy Shoaf University of Florida > Hello to all, > And especially to those of you who are using digital language lab systems > (e.g. Sony Soloist/Virtuoso, Can8 Virtual Lab, etc.). I would be interested > in knowing why your campus chose to invest in these systems as part of your > services for language instruction and learning. > > I would be happy to compile responses to this question for the list, if > others express interest. > Summer regards, > Annelie > > > Annelie Chapman, Ph.D. > Instructional Technology Coordinator > UCLA Center for Digital Humanities > > > *********************************************** > LLTI is a service of IALLT, the International Association for > Language Learning, and The Consortium for Language Teaching and > Learning (http://consortium.dartmouth.edu). > Join IALLT at http://iallt.org. > Otmar Foelsche, LLTI-Editor ([log in to unmask]) > ***********************************************