Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:25:57 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<p06240800c727c51ac33c@[192.168.1.2]> |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jon,
I love Script Debugger, but I found Script Debugger's Library
function to be somewhat unwieldy. Scripts loaded as libraries cannot
contain a run handler, the loaded objects are completely invisible in-
editor and it seems to have a small but noticeable runtime overhead
that I can't understand.
Do you personally use SD's library or any other library loading
function regularly?
Thanks,
Paul Skinner
On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:16 PM, Jon Pugh wrote:
> At 5:42 PM -0800 11/16/09, Stan Cleveland wrote:
>> There may be other library systems that I've either forgotten about
>> or of
>> which I'm unaware. Please forgive my inadvertent omissions.
>
> Script Debugger has had a library system built in for years now.
>
> It uses a similar system to Paul's suggestion, loading the library
> into the script's context (instead of the parent), so everything is
> just accessible with no work or cruft in the script. Script
> Debugger provides a library selection sheet which allows easy
> library selection and management.
>
> Jon
|
|
|