Received: |
by LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.5) with spool
id 500669 for [log in to unmask]; Tue, 16 May 2006
10:09:05 -0400
from sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au by listserv.dartmouth.edu (LSMTP for Windows
NT v1.1b) with SMTP id < [log in to unmask]>; Tue, 16
May 2006 9:59:04 -0400
from gwc2cn06.its.mq.edu.au (gwc2cn06.its.mq.edu.au [137.111.2.78])
by sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id k4GDx1n10246 for
< [log in to unmask]>; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:59:01 +1000
(EST)
from IA02DM-MTA by gwc2cn06.its.mq.edu.au with Novell_GroupWise; Tue,
16 May 2006 23:58:56 +1000 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2006 23:58:21 +1000 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
From: |
|
Sender: |
|
X-Mailer: |
Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0 |
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Members - as far as I know there are no reconstructions of Mohe or
any other northern language, except a few guesses at 'Xiongnu' words.
There are a few identified Khitan words in Jurchen. The Khitan script is
still only partially deciphered, mainly on the basis of Khitan
transcriptions of Chinese words and vice versa, but from what can be
gathered, some Khitan words look like their Mongolic equivalents, some
look a bit like their Tungusic equivalents, but most identified words do
not look like either. I recently wrote on Jurchen and Khitan in the
Festschrift for Giovanni Stary, but I am not sure if it has been
formally published yet. I have not yet seen it. Daniel Kane
>>> [log in to unmask] >>>
A recent discussion with Wei Yu Tan about his research on Kitan
reconstruction, and what appear to be a surprising (to me) degree of
Jurchen elements, has raised the question for me of how much work has
been done on northern Manchurian languages before the 12th century
Jurchens. Are there reconstructions or theoretical descriptions of
Mohe? Just wondering how old these influence might be in Kitan.
|
|
|