Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:30:44 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have plenty of classic script and apps that are 6 years old and
open fine.
One thing that is broken and I think I filed a bug report on is that
broken aliases will prevent from opening.
Have you tried changing the extension to .scpt?
-Mark
Who sometimes misses system 7.
On Jan 23, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Simon Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies if this is an old subject, maybe I'm using the wrong search
> terms because I didn't find anything in the archives and I'd have
> thought
> it was a very common problem for scripters moving from OS9 to OSX...
>
> I can't open any of my OS9 Applescripts on my 10.4.4 machine. I've
> only
> recently upgraded to OSX and was surprised to find that all the OS9
> compiled scripts that I transfer either from CD or USB Flash drive
> show up
> as Terminal documents, but can't be opened with Terminal, Script
> Editor or
> Script Debugger. I tried using the OS9 version of Script Editor in the
> Classic environment but without success. It seems that the files just
> aren't recognised as valid Applescripts.
>
> I'm guessing that this is because they are scripts stored in the
> resource-
> fork, but I thought there would be a utility available to transfer
> them
> (without saving them all as text on the OS9 machine). Even if they
> can't
> be executed without re-compilation, I'd just like to get the code
> out of
> the files, as none of the OS9 machines that I have access to now
> have CD
> burners on them, so recreating the original CDs I stored the
> projects on
> would be a problem, even if I found out why files on the existing CDs
> can't be read.
>
> Has this been a common problem, or is it something to do with my
> particular setup (moving directly from OS9 to Tiger).
>
> Any info/suggestions most gratefully accepted.
>
> Simon
>
|
|
|