Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:15:38 EDT |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Forwarded Message from Bob Majors <[log in to unmask]> ---
>User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418
>Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:09:24 -0700
>Subject: Re: #7269 Mac vs. Windows
>From: Bob Majors <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
------------------
Betty,
There's enough in your questions to fill up several pages of responses, but
I'll toss in a few things that might help.
> Doesn't running RevRDist or something equivalent on them before
> the class starts get them to be uniform?
If PCRDist or equivalent is set up right, and works with your environment,
yes.
> If classes are contiguous, is it likely that individual machines will get
> messed up enough not to work for the second class?
Not if the image is refreshed, and/or you use some of the Windows
capabilities. For example, our machines are locked down (in a software
security sense); the users are Restricted Users; and the user profile is
Global Mandatory Roaming, so that at each login, the profile is renewed to
its pristine condition. (The roaming profile is stored on a Windows file
server.)
Our biggest problem lately is keeping the machines patched regularly to
avoid the increasing number of exploits. Automatic Windows Update daily is
one method; commercial products like Shavlik's hfnetcheck can push patches
out to machines.
Bob Majors
Language Learning Center
University of Washington
|
|
|