> It would be simple enough to allow it to pursue all paths and add each to the out-bound e-mail.


Since none of us are programmers at FileMaker Inc., none of us have any idea how simple that would be. Looks simple -- and it would certainly be simple for us to use -- but when the software has a lot of moving parts, they have to make sure nothing else gets broken when they add each "simple" feature.

They also have to make sure that they are working on the features that will bring the best return, and keep the company profitable. I'll bet that's not easy.

However, if you want a place to let FMI know how you feel:
  <http://www.filemaker.com/company/contact/feature_request.html>


Paul


--
Paul Spafford
FileMaker Database Superhero,
Spafford Data Solutions

Tel: 613 838 9956
www.paulspafford.com
www.ottawafilemakerdeveloper.com
www.fmlayoutmode.com






On Mar 31, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Chuck Pelto wrote:

> That's on crummy analogy, Richard. 
> 
> 
> On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Richard S. Russell wrote:
> 
>> On 2011 Mar 31, at 6:50, Chuck Pelto wrote:
>> 
>>> So it's another one of those FMI 'Well give the users what we want WHEN we want to give it to them."
>>> 
>>> Great....
>> 
>> 
>> 9 women gestating for 1 month apiece do not produce a baby. Even ignoring all the OTHER demands on FMI's programmer time, some things proceed using serial circuits rather than parallel.
> 
> The scriptstep even allows you put in multiple paths. It would be simple enough to allow it to pursue all paths and add each to the out-bound e-mail.
> 
> Instead, I have to send two e-mails.
> 
> Face it....
> 
> ....it's kludge.