FMPRO-L Archives

May 2011, Week 4

FMPRO-L@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Kubica <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
FileMaker Pro Discussions <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 May 2011 13:43:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
John,

Cologon's SuperLog includes an example for how to parse the data out of the "big field" into Audit records so you can manipulate/report on it how you wanna.

Sincerely,
 
Chris Kubica

On May 25, 2011, at 1:14 PM, John Wenmeekers wrote:

> On Wed, 25 May 2011 08:29:01 -0700, John Weinshel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi John
> 
> Hi John....
>> 
>> I missed Salman's reply, and it helps if you quote at least part of the
>> post to which you're responding, so that, in this case, I would know what
>> Salman had suggested.
> 
> Sorry, I sent a reply directly from my mobile email program. No 'quote'
> button there....
> I should not use new toys.....without mastering all the features....
> 
> Salman suggested a plug in.
> We try to use only native functions in FileMaker, if possible.
> 
> 
>> In any event, I recall your original post said something about 'not just
>> an audit', but that you seemed to be asking for exactly that-- a record of
>> who changed what, and when they did so. Or am I missing something and you
>> want more than that?
> 
> It is a little bit more.
> We already use an (adapted) audit log system. (based on Ray Cologon's AuditLog)
> That will log the changes and return the changes all in one field.
> 
> What we need is the possibility to use the data about the changes to
> generate reports.
> Like:
> how many changes on a specific record during a day, day range, week, month.
> Which field has the most changes.
> Which change happens the most...
> 
> I only see this possible if we push the changes, not in a field, but in a table.
> Table = records = data = possibility to use functions = generate reports.
> 
> We have already a system to capture meta data from tables and work with the
> results.
> Only the changes to fields and records is a gap.
> 
> I hope this is a little more clear.
> 
> In Kindness
> 
> JW

ATOM RSS1 RSS2