= = = = = = On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Chuck Pelto <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > That's QUITE a litany of issues. > > I'm surprised at the lack of support for iPv6. That's been around for quite > some time and although it is not as widely accepted as I think it SHOULD be, > I would have thought FMI would be more proactive. Oh....wait....I'd > forgotten about all the thinks they should have added back in FMP3 > days.....<heavy sigh>.... = = = = = = Richard observes: I have no inside technical knowledge, so I'll let somebody who does give a definitive answer to this, but it's possible that FMI would have had to fiddle with the basic ".FP7" file format to include IP6 compatibility. I for one am delighted that they've been able to make ".FP7" last as long as they have, and it would take a lot more than IP6 compatibility to make me want to have to deal with a new file format.