On 3/16/08, MACSCRPT automatic digest Maybe we subscribe digest mode because we don't want to have to delete NUMEROUS gratuitous whiny etiquette emails from list snobs. Just a thought... system <[log in to unmask] wrote: > There are 2 messages totalling 49 lines in this issue. > > Topics of the day: > > 1. Annoying Digest Replies (2) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:59:24 -0800 > From: Walter Ian Kaye <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Annoying Digest Replies > > At 06:06 p -0400 03/15/2008, Gary (Lists) didst inscribe upon an > electronic papyrus: > > >"MACSCRPT automatic digest system" wrote: > > > >> From: MACSCRPT automatic digest system > > > >Please stop replying to digests without: > > > > changing the subject > > cleaning up the text > > Agreed. Choosing digest mode means accepting certain > responsibilities. Mailing list etiquette has developed to be fair to > the other members of the list. To not follow that etiquette is to > behave in an antisocial manner. Please don't waste other people's > finite resources, which is what you do when you shirk your email > responsibilities. > > If you don't want the responsibility of fixing the subject line, then > don't use digest mode. > > -boo > who can't imagine why anyone would even want to use digest mode > (apart from AOL users). > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:04:02 -0300 > From: Bill Briggs <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: Annoying Digest Replies > > At 11:59 PM -0800 3/15/08, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: > >who can't imagine why anyone would even want to use digest mode > > I'll second that. > > - web > > ------------------------------ > > End of MACSCRPT Digest - 15 Mar 2008 to 16 Mar 2008 (#2008-30) > ************************************************************** >