Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=10061, phase=CONNECT, target=127.0.0.1:2306). The server is probably not started.
--- Forwarded Message from "Dartmouth College LISTSERV Server (14.4)" <[log in to unmask]> --- >Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:47:58 -0400 >From: "Dartmouth College LISTSERV Server (14.4)" <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: LLTI: approval required (BA62B073) >To: [log in to unmask] This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask] to the LLTI list at LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU. You can approve it using the "OK" mechanism (click on the link below), ignore it, or repost an edited copy. The message will expire automatically and you do not need to do anything if you just want to discard it. Please refer to the list owner's guide if you are not familiar with the "OK" mechanism; these instructions are being kept purposefully short for your convenience in processing large numbers of messages. To APPROVE the message: http://listserv.dartmouth.edu/scripts/wa.exe?OK=BA62B073&L=LLTI Hi, We have the old Sanako system when it was called Tandberg. Our instructors did NOT adjust to it quickly. We have had it for 6 years and they still are adjusting. We try to adjust to what their level is. Our goal is to "lure" one or two "new" professors into using the Sanako system each semester. So we do a lot of "marketing" and training to our faculty about the wonderful advantages they can get from our system. We have trained lab technicians who will take care of all the equipment and we tell the professor to just facilitate the class and let us know what their lesson plan is. My staff are trained to offer suggestions--once they hear the lesson plan--on how to use some aspect of our system that they may or may not have been aware of to add a new layer to their lesson plan. The professor will accept the suggestion or reject it based upon their goals and their comfort levels. Starting last year we suddenly had a growing number of professors who wanted to take control of the technology as well as the lesson plan, so we eagerly encouraged them to do so. Of course, as they learned one area of Sanako we would teach them another, so they often still need us. But we try to be as hands on or hands off as the professors need and want. Has Sanako increased our lab attendance? Yes, definitely. Once they start coming even once or twice a semester with their instructors into our "Smart Lab" where Sanako is, they tend to come back on their own to try out other software and other capabilities or our lab. That's one of the reasons we try so hard to recruit professors to use our Smart Lab. For each professor, we get hundreds of hours in lab attendance (and thus funding) per semester. We don't come close to fully utilizing the Sanako system, but that gives me hope because there continues to be new ways our instructors can use the equipment so they don't get bored. I find that my staff like to learn new things about Sanako one at a time. Then once they have learned that new thing; they turn around and promote it to the instructors. Then I can introduce a new aspect of it to my staff. Sorry to be longwinded. Hope this helps. Peggy C. Marcy Supervisor Language Learning Center Mt. San Antonio College *********************************************** LLTI is a service of IALLT, the International Association for Language Learning, and The Consortium for Language Teaching and Learning (http://consortium.dartmouth.edu). Join IALLT at http://iallt.org. Otmar Foelsche, LLTI-Editor ([log in to unmask]) ***********************************************