--- Forwarded Message from David Herren <[log in to unmask]> --- >Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:54:31 -0400 >From: David Herren <[log in to unmask]> >To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]> >In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: Re: #6314 OS X 10.1 and Chinese/Korean ------------------ On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 08:12 AM, LLTI-Editor wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that Chinese and Korean are not fully = implemented=20 > in > OS 10.1? Keyboards are there, fonts are there, but alas input does = not > work. > > Is there something I am missing? I have not done this yet myself, but allow me to forward a couple of=20 messages from the Omnigroup's OSX-talk list about activating Korean and=20= Chinese input methods. The poster, Tim Chong, definitely seems to know=20= what he's doing so I might recommend a private message to him if you=20 continue to have difficulties. Note that his "hack" for 10.1 requires = the=20 pre-10.1 release of OSX for Asia, which is not readily available, though=20= the Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish, and Danish Mac OS X distributions also=20= contain the Far East languages if you can get a copy of any of those. Finally, I would recommend a message to Apple's feedback about making=20 these input methods available in the US: http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/ From: Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]> Date: Fri Sep 28, 2001 11:18:31 PM US/Eastern To: George McKinlay <[log in to unmask]> Cc: <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Chinese on X What kinda of problem are you having? I can input Chinese (Trad/Simp),=20= Japanese and Hangul (Korean) without problem on my TiBook (10.1)... = <http://www.oeyvind.org/board/zboard.php?id=3DMacOSX&page=3D1&category=3D&= sn=3Doff& ss=3Don&sc=3Don&keyword=3D&select_arrange=3Dheadnum&desc=3Dasc&no=3D19> Tim -- Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]> MIME | NeXTmail OK! http://www.oeyvind.org/ P.S. BTW, for Chinese input, I have only used the Pinyin method as I = hvae=20 no idea on the others. On Friday, September 28, 2001, at 09:46 , George McKinlay wrote: Chinese is in 10.1m but the data entry method is not really functional, = I=20 couldn't get any app to work, yet Japanese works... _______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [log in to unmask] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin From: Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]> Date: Tue Oct 02, 2001 11:11:23 PM US/Eastern To: Thierry Deval <[log in to unmask]> Cc: <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: Chinese on X On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 07:03 , Thierry Deval wrote: On Saturday, September 29, 2001, at 05:18 , Tim Chong wrote: What kinda of problem are you having? I can input Chinese (Trad/Simp),=20= Japanese and Hangul (Korean) without problem on my TiBook (10.1)... = <http://www.oeyvind.org/board/zboard.php?id=3DMacOSX&page=3D1&category=3D&= sn=3Doff& ss=3Don&sc=3Don&keyword=3D&select_arrange=3Dheadnum&desc=3Dasc&no=3D19> Tim -- OK, and what if you don't have a Far East Mac OS X edition CD at hand ? Then you can use the hack as I described above, to enable all the IMEs. = Do=20 note, the 10.1 Far East CD is not ready yet... so far I have able to get=20= 10.0.3 IME working with 10.1 US, although I can see some warning cause = by=20 /System/Library/Components/PIMUIServer.app <- which I think should be=20 updated in 10.1 version. --> you can't use chinese/korean input methods !!! (The fonts are almost all there) Apple LiGothic Medium.dfont AppleGothic.dfont Hei.dfont You can if u have the CD as I stated... here's some Chinese (Simplified = &=20 Traditional) & Korean text: =E7=B9=81=E9=AB=94=E4=B8=AD=E6=96=87 =E7=AE=80=E4=BD=93=E4=B8=AD=E6=96=87 = =EC=84=9C=EC=9A=B8=ED=8A=B9=EB=B3=84=EC=8B=9C You should be able to see them all as I used the normal fonts that = exists=20 in 10.1...=3D) But, as George pointed out, only the Japanese input method is = active/works. .. Japanese has been working since the very first day 10.0 ships...=3D) -- Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]> MIME | NeXTmail OK! http://www.oeyvind.org/ /david -- david herren - shoreham, vt Microsoft says they're going to create "fault tolerant" software. Why bother? They've spent two decades developing fault tolerant = customers.