--- Forwarded Message from gbartle <[log in to unmask]> ---

>Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 10:35:51 -0600
>Sender: gbartle <[log in to unmask]>
>From: gbartle <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum               <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: RE: #5298.1 CAN 8 (!)

------------------
I know I sound like an advertisement for CAN 8, and please keep in mind that I 
have only been working with it since August of this year, but there have been 
no crashes so far. I've got my fingers crossed...

Good luck!

Gamin

>===== Original Message From Language Learning and Technology International 
Information Forum              <[log in to unmask]> =====
>--- Forwarded Message from "Kevin C. Carroll" <[log in to unmask]> ---
>
>>In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:27:39 -0500
>>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum
      <[log in to unmask]>
>>From: "Kevin C. Carroll" <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: Re: #5298 CAN 8
>
>------------------
>I would like to thank everyone who took the time to answer my query in
>regards to upgrading our language lab. I am following up on the suggestions
>regarding the CAN-8 system.
>
>However, the discourse has left me with two questions:
>
>1) Since the CAN-8 system is a software and hardware solution, have any
>users experienced problems with integrating the cards into your PCs? I
>expect a digital system to hang or crash occasionally, but do you find
>crashes to be excessive?
>
>2) I'm still wondering if anyone is using a software only digital lab. I
>realize this might not be feasible, but I would like to stay away from
>using third-party cards in my PC's if possible.
>
>
>Once again, thanks for all the great suggestions!
>
>Kevin C. Carroll
>Senior Systems Technologist
>
>Wayne State University
>Foreign Language Technology Center
>385 Manoogian Hall
>Detroit, MI 48202
>
>313.577.0807 (voice)
>313.577.3041 (fax)
>
>[log in to unmask]