LLTI Archives

November 1999, Week 2

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 13:40:02 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines)
--- Forwarded Message from "Jerry and Carolyn Dean" <[log in to unmask]> ---

>From: "Jerry and Carolyn Dean" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: "Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum"    <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re:     No significant difference
>Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 18:57:27 -0600

------------------
TBob - never thought I'd see the day you
wouldn't know where a website was!!!
!!!The end is near!!!
(amitie')
C

-----Original Message-----
From: LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, November 05, 1999 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: #5296.9 Technology and Enhanced
Student Learning (!)


--- Forwarded Message from Matthew Mattingly
<[log in to unmask]> ---

>Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 14:32:52 -0500
>From: Matthew Mattingly
<[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: #5296 Technology and Enhanced
Student Learning
>To: Language Learning and Technology
International Information Forum
<[log in to unmask]>
>References: <[log in to unmask]>

------------------
You can tune into a perpetual discussion of
these and (sometimes
tenuously-) related issues by subscribing to
the IFETS list:
http://ifets.ieee.org/maillist.html

a good jumping off point to read up on this
stuff is "Asking the Right
Question: What Does Research Tell Us About
Technology and Higher
Learning?  by Stephen C. Ehrmann.

http://www.learner.org/edtech/rscheval/rightq
uestion.html

The literature tends to be *very* contentious
and controversial.  The
"no significant difference" argument referred
to in the answers to your
posts has its own website now,
http://cuda.teleeducation.nb.ca/nosignificant
difference/

and a positivist companion

http://cuda.teleeducation.nb.ca/significantdi
fference/

I have had to produce appropriately footnoted
and referenced memos on
this question before, and can provide you
with more references if you
wish.  Do you think your Provost is likely to
pore over your carefully
researched reply and and make informed
decisions based on it? If so,
it's worth the effort.

Matthew

LLTI-Editor wrote:
>
> --- Forwarded Message from "Jorth, Cindy"
<[log in to unmask]> ---
>


*********************************************
***************************
Matthew Mattingly
[log in to unmask]
Director
(413) 542-8163
Five Colleges Multimedia Access Project
FAX (413) 542-2662
Box 2256
http://www.amherst.edu/~map
Amherst College
Amherst, MA 01002
*********************************************
***************************

asking the right question:
http://www.learner.org/edtech/rscheval/rightq
uestion.html

-----Original Message-----

Subject: Re: #5296.12 Technology and Enhanced
Student Learning (!)



Wish I had the URL.

TBob

Bob Peckham
Director, The Globe-Gate Project

ATOM RSS1 RSS2