LLTI Archives

August 1999, Week 4

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
#5154 CALL question
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:25:20 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
--- Forwarded Message from "Bill Harrell" <[log in to unmask]> ---

>From: "Bill Harrell" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: CALL
>Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 20:16:47 -0500

I'm hoping you can help me. Some people might claim that CALL (computer-assisted language learning) is a productivity tool. Others might maintain that CALL is actually a cognitive stimulator. Where might I look to find points to support both positions? Thank you. The more references you can point me toward the better. Dr. William "Bill" Harrell, Jr.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2