Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) |
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_D8D9100A-7EBD-43A8-AC9A-BFB0E2792016";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jul 2014 22:22:48 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Jul 10, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Shane Stanley wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2014, at 3:00 am, kee nethery <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> If you write AppleScripts on a regular basis, you know that some dictionary entries might not work as advertised
>
> In the case of Xcode, that's a bit of an understatement. The dictionary is pretty much what worked in Xcode 3, and whether any particular part works now is entirely pot luck.
>
> That's not to say some of your scripts can't be written, but you'd need to keep your fingers crossed with every upgrade. I gave up.
>
> Mind you, extra requests to bugreport.apple.com can't hurt.
I heard a while back that Sal was trying to find a way to get scripting support back into Xcode but I don’t think he had much luck. The team didn’t have time and it wasn’t viewed as sufficiently important.
So send in those bug reports.
Jon
|
|
|