MACSCRPT Archives

July 2009

MACSCRPT@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sander Tekelenburg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Macintosh Scripting Systems <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:41:39 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
At 21:23 -0700 UTC, on 2009-07-29, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:

> At 04:40 a -0400 07/29/2009, J. Stewart didst inscribe upon an
> electronic papyrus:
>
>><http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2002/tn2065.html>

[...]

>    "Unless you are doing system-level development, you should never need
>     to change anything in /System - changing /Library should suffice."
>
> So /Library doesn't require admin privs for any user at all, whether
> shell script or Finder? If that's the case, then I'm all set. :D

I think you should interpret that sentence in the context of the rest of that
paragraph... ;) Seems to me Apple is merely repeating its mantra of "don't
mess around with /System if you can achieve the same elsewhere". In other
words, this refers to permissions only in the sense that it is a general
warning not to abuse your powers once you have admin permissions.


-- 
Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2