LLTI Archives

September 2006, Week 3

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:38:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
--- Forwarded Message from Language Archives
<[log in to unmask]> ---

>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:39:14 -0500
>From: Language Archives <[log in to unmask]>
>User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719)
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Creating MP3s

Language study at the University of Chicago is moving (fairly abruptly) 
into digital delivery. I have captured audio from tapes as .wav files 
(40 kHz, 16- or 24-bit). I want to convert these to mp3s files, but I 
find that iTunes (which I am using right now) gives me three pre-set 
options and then I can customize as I choose. Can anyone tell me what 
perceptible differences they have noticed among these various options? 
Good (128 kbps) and Higher (192) (both mono and 48 kHz) sound basically 
the same to me, with a 13 MB difference in size for the same material. 
What would 320 kbps get me? (Is there anyone out there doing phonetic 
analysis of language audio?)

Barbara


***********************************************
 LLTI is a service of IALLT, the International Association for
Language Learning (http://iallt.org/), and The Consortium for Language Teaching
and Learning (http://www.languageconsortium.org/).
Join IALLT at http://iallt.org.
Otmar Foelsche, LLTI-Editor ([log in to unmask])
***********************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2