--- Forwarded Message from Judy Shoaf <[log in to unmask]> ---

>Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:19:04 -0400
>From: Judy Shoaf <[log in to unmask]>
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.7)
Gecko/20050414
>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum   
<[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: #7954 Rationale for digital language lab systems
>References: <[log in to unmask]>
>In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>

We invested in the system because our old cassette audio lab was both 
heavily used for classes and testing, and failing, so a replacement was 
justified, and digital seemed to be the right move.

Judy Shoaf
University of Florida



> Hello to all,
> And especially to those of you who are using digital language lab systems
> (e.g. Sony Soloist/Virtuoso, Can8 Virtual Lab, etc.). I would be interested
> in knowing why your campus chose to invest in these systems as part of your
> services for language instruction and learning.
> 
> I would be happy to compile responses to this question for the list, if
> others express interest.
> Summer regards,
> Annelie
> 
> 
> Annelie Chapman, Ph.D.
> Instructional Technology Coordinator
> UCLA Center for Digital Humanities
> 
> 
> ***********************************************
>  LLTI is a service of IALLT, the International Association for
> Language Learning, and The Consortium for Language Teaching and
> Learning (http://consortium.dartmouth.edu).
> Join IALLT at http://iallt.org.
> Otmar Foelsche, LLTI-Editor ([log in to unmask])
> ***********************************************