--- Forwarded Message from "Alvaro R. Gonzalez" <[log in to unmask]> ---

>Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:52:03 -0400
>From: "Alvaro R. Gonzalez" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: #6797 MS Windows encoding
>In-reply-to: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum    <[log in to unmask]>

------------------
Zach,
I have recently installed IE5.5sp2 with Chinese, Japanese, Pan-Euro and 
Arabic options on 29 WinNT stations.  With no attention paid to grouping, 
nor even any settings within IE, these all work on my lab machines without 
a hitch.
Are your machines presenting a problem with recognizing/rendering?  If so, 
which version of IE?  What OS?

Álvaro González
Wittenberg University
[log in to unmask]

At 08:23 AM 08/29/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>--- Forwarded Message from Zachary Chandler <[log in to unmask]> ---
>
> >Date:         Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:50:34 -0400
> >From: Zachary Chandler <[log in to unmask]>
> >Subject:      MS Windows encoding
> >To: [log in to unmask]
>
>Hello,
>
>I am new to the list and have scanned the archive, so I apologize if this
>issue has already been dealt with.
>
>In Internet Explorer under Tools ... Internet Options ... General (tab) ...
>Languages (button), I was configuring which languages the browser
>would support and  I noticed that they are listed in a hierarchy of
>importance.  Presumably when there is overlap, a higher ranked
>language is the default.
>
>How have other people ranked these languages? Should similar
>writing systems (CJK for example) be closely grouped?
>
>Zach Chandler
>Colby College