LLTI Archives

April 2002, Week 4

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:58:46 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
--- Forwarded Message from "George Williams" <[log in to unmask]> ---

>From: "George Williams" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Auto-Correcting and Second Language Acquisition
>Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:48:21 -0700
>Importance: Normal

As I finish up my research project, I find I have another question.  The
students writing in the CALL class did improve but not by a significant
difference, whereas the SDAIE class did.  When the CALL class writes they
use the computer for most of their writing.  The question I have is does the
Auto-Correct feature on word processors help, inhibit or have no effect on
student writing progress in Second Language Acquisition?
George Williams
Moreno Valley HS

ATOM RSS1 RSS2