--- Forwarded Message from David Herren <[log in to unmask]> ---
>Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:54:31 -0400
>From: David Herren <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: #6314 OS X 10.1 and Chinese/Korean
------------------
On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 08:12 AM, LLTI-Editor wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that Chinese and Korean are not fully =
implemented=20
> in
> OS 10.1? Keyboards are there, fonts are there, but alas input does =
not
> work.
>
> Is there something I am missing?
I have not done this yet myself, but allow me to forward a couple of=20
messages from the Omnigroup's OSX-talk list about activating Korean and=20=
Chinese input methods. The poster, Tim Chong, definitely seems to know=20=
what he's doing so I might recommend a private message to him if you=20
continue to have difficulties. Note that his "hack" for 10.1 requires =
the=20
pre-10.1 release of OSX for Asia, which is not readily available, though=20=
the Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish, and Danish Mac OS X distributions also=20=
contain the Far East languages if you can get a copy of any of those.
Finally, I would recommend a message to Apple's feedback about making=20
these input methods available in the US:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/
From: Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri Sep 28, 2001 11:18:31 PM US/Eastern
To: George McKinlay <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Chinese on X
What kinda of problem are you having? I can input Chinese (Trad/Simp),=20=
Japanese and Hangul (Korean) without problem on my TiBook (10.1)...
=
<http://www.oeyvind.org/board/zboard.php?id=3DMacOSX&page=3D1&category=3D&=
sn=3Doff&
ss=3Don&sc=3Don&keyword=3D&select_arrange=3Dheadnum&desc=3Dasc&no=3D19>
Tim
--
Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]>
MIME | NeXTmail OK!
http://www.oeyvind.org/
P.S. BTW, for Chinese input, I have only used the Pinyin method as I =
hvae=20
no idea on the others.
On Friday, September 28, 2001, at 09:46 , George McKinlay wrote:
Chinese is in 10.1m but the data entry method is not really functional, =
I=20
couldn't get any app to work, yet Japanese works...
_______________________________________________
MacOSX-admin mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
From: Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue Oct 02, 2001 11:11:23 PM US/Eastern
To: Thierry Deval <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Chinese on X
On Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 07:03 , Thierry Deval wrote:
On Saturday, September 29, 2001, at 05:18 , Tim Chong wrote:
What kinda of problem are you having? I can input Chinese (Trad/Simp),=20=
Japanese and Hangul (Korean) without problem on my TiBook (10.1)...
=
<http://www.oeyvind.org/board/zboard.php?id=3DMacOSX&page=3D1&category=3D&=
sn=3Doff&
ss=3Don&sc=3Don&keyword=3D&select_arrange=3Dheadnum&desc=3Dasc&no=3D19>
Tim
--
OK, and what if you don't have a Far East Mac OS X edition CD at hand ?
Then you can use the hack as I described above, to enable all the IMEs. =
Do=20
note, the 10.1 Far East CD is not ready yet... so far I have able to get=20=
10.0.3 IME working with 10.1 US, although I can see some warning cause =
by=20
/System/Library/Components/PIMUIServer.app <- which I think should be=20
updated in 10.1 version.
--> you can't use chinese/korean input methods !!!
(The fonts are almost all there)
Apple LiGothic Medium.dfont
AppleGothic.dfont
Hei.dfont
You can if u have the CD as I stated... here's some Chinese (Simplified =
&=20
Traditional) & Korean text:
=E7=B9=81=E9=AB=94=E4=B8=AD=E6=96=87 =E7=AE=80=E4=BD=93=E4=B8=AD=E6=96=87 =
=EC=84=9C=EC=9A=B8=ED=8A=B9=EB=B3=84=EC=8B=9C
You should be able to see them all as I used the normal fonts that =
exists=20
in 10.1...=3D)
But, as George pointed out, only the Japanese input method is =
active/works.
..
Japanese has been working since the very first day 10.0 ships...=3D)
--
Tim Chong <[log in to unmask]>
MIME | NeXTmail OK!
http://www.oeyvind.org/
/david
--
david herren - shoreham, vt
Microsoft says they're going to create "fault tolerant" software.
Why bother? They've spent two decades developing fault tolerant =
customers.
|
