LLTI Archives

October 2001, Week 1

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:12:07 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
--- Forwarded Message from "," <[log in to unmask]> ---

>From: "," <[log in to unmask]>
>To: "'Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum'"     <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: RE: #6310 Digital Language Labs
>Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 09:11:48 -0400

------------------
We've had good experience with both Sony and Tandberg. Our current lab is a
Tandberg and it has performed flawlessly.

-----Original Message-----
From: LLTI-Editor [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: #6310 Digital Language Labs


--- Forwarded Message from "Jones, Keith" <[log in to unmask]> ---

>Subject: Digital Language Labs
>Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 07:09:53 -0500
>Thread-Topic: Digital Language Labs
>Thread-Index: AcFLOyT1DoPp0RSFQwizc6wZ8KNXqg==
>From: "Jones, Keith" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>


We are a private k-12 school in St. Louis Missouri. We are interested in
replacing our analog lab with a digital lab. Among the vendors we are
aware of are ASC, Tandberg and Sony. Are there other players? Any
recommendations? Thank you.


============================================
To err is human--and to blame it on a computer is even more so.
            -- Robert Orben

Keith Jones
MS Technology Coordinator
MICDS
314-995-7363
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2