LLTI Archives

November 2000, Week 4

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:08:55 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
--- Forwarded Message from [log in to unmask] ---

>From: [log in to unmask]
>Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:56:13 EST
>Subject: Re: #5836.1 virtual labs (!)
>To: [log in to unmask]

I think most people would understand " traditional lab".

Jean Teel

In a message dated 11/22/00 7:38:04 AM Central Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< >
 >> From: [log in to unmask]
 >> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:52:02 -0500
 >> To: [log in to unmask]
 >> Subject: virtual labs
 >
 >
 > Could you suggest a word here please? I'm always stymied
 > by my limited lexicon when I fumble for the right word
 > to use nowadays...
 >
 >    What is the opposite of VIRTUAL LAB?
 >
 >
 > It's not enough to say THE LAB anymore.
 >
 > I've tried
 >
 > PHYSICAL SPACE
 > HARD WALLS
 > THE REAL LAB
 > THE ACTUAL LAB
 >
 >     ... none are satisfying!
 >
 >
 > Thanks in advance for your creative contributions     :}
 >
 > best,
 > bruce
 >
 > Bruce Parkhurst
 > Geddes Language Center
 > Boston University
  >>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2