LLTI Archives

July 2000, Week 3

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:49:34 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
--- Forwarded Message from "Cahill, Linda E." <[log in to unmask]> ---

>From: "Cahill, Linda E." <[log in to unmask]>
>To: "'Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum'"     <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: RE: #5628 Language Lab experience
>Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:17:10 -0400

------------------
Our lab is the most popular aspect of our program. Would you like a detailed
description of the lab/program? Would that help?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: LLTI-Editor [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 1:10 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      #5628 Language Lab experience
> 
> >From: "John Harris" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 17:24:44 -0500
> 
> At Samford University, we are upgrading our language lab.  Language
> students are not rating their language lab experiences highly.  We believe
> we need to look at our language pedagogies and their interaction with our
> language lab improvements.  I work across Samford University to facilitate
> assessment of programs and their improvement.  Could you direct me to
> individuals and program that optimize the interaction of language pedagogy
> and language labs?
> 
> John Harris
> Associate Provost for Quality Assessment
> Samford University
> Birmingham, AL 35229-7020
> (205) 726-2674

ATOM RSS1 RSS2