Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:34:01 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Forwarded Message from Michael Bush <[log in to unmask]> ---
>Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:46:32 -0800
>From: Michael Bush <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: RE: #5453.9 spelling questions (!)
>In-reply-to: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
>Importance: Normal
------------------
Derek Roff wrote:
> Although it is dangerous to correct, or even modify anything Mike says,
> there is a coda to this story.
Dangerous? What?!?! You think I have a hit squad for anyone who disagrees?
*grin*
and then continued:
> I read the report of a consortium of the
> DVD powerful- computer hardware and software companies, home theater
> hardware people, and media content producers (movie studios), who had a
> lengthy debate over the "official" meaning of DVD. The computer side
> mostly wanted the "V" to stand for "Versatile," while the others wanted to
> use "Video," so as not to confuse the customers. After months of
> discussion, they found a solution- DVD stands for nothing! DVD means DVD.
> It is not an acronym, but a name. Thus decided the powers that were.
Go to:
http://www.dvdforum.org/
Where you will find:
> DVD Forum
>
> The DVD Forum (formerly called DVD Consortium) is an
> ad-hoc association of hardware manufacturers,
> software firms and other users of Digital Versatile
> Discs (the "DVD Format"), created for the purpose of
> exchanging and disseminating ideas and information
> about the DVD Format and its technical capabilities,
> improvements and innovations.
I think that Derek is right in that those discussions did in fact take
place; however, this quote supports that the group came to a resolution of
the discussion.
Cheers,
Michael Bush
Associate Professor of French and
Instructional Psychology and Technology
Brigham Young University
[log in to unmask]
http://moliere.byu.edu/digital/
|
|
|