LLTI Archives

December 2002, Week 2

LLTI@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
LLTI-Editor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 08:18:32 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
--- Forwarded Message from jeremy c munson <[log in to unmask]> ---

>Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:50:11 -0800 (PST)
>From: jeremy c munson <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Language Learning and Technology International Information Forum    <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: #6962 Web Cam
>In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>

------------------

We have been doing lots of research and demo testing web cams.
I think it's important to keep in mind the limitations of your
infrastructure when purchasing a camera(s).

The polycom viaVideo (VV) is a desktop unit that appears to be the best
out there ($400), according to the experts that we've been talking to.
Unlike other web cams, the VV has a built in codec to process the image so
it doesn't burden the CPU.  And it can maximally transfer at (384kb/s) via
IP.  However, if you are talking to someone who's on a 56k modem, the
image is going to be choppy for both of you, no matter what kind of camera
you are using.

Just a few thoughts.

J. Munson
Language Learning Center
University of Washington

ATOM RSS1 RSS2