FMPRO-L Archives

April 2011, Week 3

FMPRO-L@LISTSERV.DARTMOUTH.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Richard S. Russell" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
FileMaker Pro Discussions <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:23:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
A client asked me for advice on how to export data from a modest-sized file of <20,000 people. As we discussed what he wanted and why, he said he was looking for something he could upload to an on-line contact management system (CMS) that would replace his current FMP system. I thot this was kind of sad but doable. Then he got to the ugly bit. He's looking for flat-file output, because the people he'll have working on data entry in the future are too unsophisticated and ephemeral to deal with the complexities of relationality.

Let me spare you the effort you're about to invest in telling me what a terrible, terrible idea this is. I doubt that you could come up with anything I haven't already tried on him, to no avail. It's going to happen, with or without my help.

I explained that FileMaker Pro was kind of like a lobster trap. It's easy to get in (IE, move from a flat-file system to a relational one), because FMP has all sorts of tools to make it happen; but it's hard to get out (IE, move from relational to flat-file). I was kind of stumped right off the top of my head trying to figure out how I'd convert a portal of, say, 20 financial contributions, each with 8 fields (like amount, date, purpose, etc.) to 160 spreadsheet-style columns.

Has anyone else faced this kind of situation? Any advice (beyond the obvious "Don't do it!")?


= = = = = =
Richard S. Russell, a Bright (http://the-brights.net)
2642 Kendall Av. #2, Madison  WI  53705-3736
608+233-5640 • [log in to unmask]
http://richardsrussell.livejournal.com/

= = = = = =
No sense in being pessimistic. It won't work anyway.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2