Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:19:24 -0430 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Steve,
I had read again your post and there is something I don't understand well.
You said that "using Dropbox with two computers there are at least three
copies of the file".
But I'm using a "symbolic link", that, AFAIK is in fact an "alias" of the DB
and not a real copy...
I'm now more confussed :(
Best
On 26/07/10 11:50, "Steve Cassidy" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Pedro
>
> The first things to consider would be:
>
> (i) Is it possible that the records were in fact deleted? If the delete
> command is available in the file, it is always possible it has been used.
>
> (ii) Is it possible that you have mismanaged copies of the file (such as when
> using DropBox)? If there is no gap in the incremental record number
> (presumably an auto-enter serial number) then this is a good possibility. It
> is possible that the three lost records were input into a different copy of
> the file. When using DropBox with two computers, there are at least three
> copies of the file (on the original computer, on the DropBox server, and on
> your second computer). If both computers are not constantly connected to the
> internet, it seems fairly likely that this type of problem could happen.
>
> I'm not sure DropBox goes very well with Filemaker. There's no essential
> problem with the combination, but it does seem like keeping track of versions
> could be quite difficult.
>
> With a simple database file, it is fairly unlikely that corruption or hard
> disk problems will occur. Filemaker is very reliable when used correctly.
>
> Steve
>
>
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Pedro Perdomo-Miteff wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> No, is on a single Mac.
>> But there is something...
>>
>> I had a Dropbox account and put a "symbolic link" of the DB on it, so i can
>> open it at home when I'm away from office.
>>
>> Would be a problem?
>>
>> Best
|
|
|