That's the point. To get an idea of how I would integrate it I would have to see the schema.

Is that available in the test file?

j.


On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:10 PM, David Haney wrote:

> Jonathan,
> 
> No confusion, just wanted a better feel for your term “bolt-on”, but I got it. The accounting template is specifically designed for integration into existing solutions. Its a basic template and easy to reverse-engineer so you can add functions and easily integrate. I’ve seen several different ways others have integrated it and was interested in how you would do it. Its all cool! 
> 
> David Haney
> ADVANCE DATABASE SYSTEMS LLC
> PO Box 17410, Phoenix, AZ 85011
> http://advancedatabasesystems.com
> [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 602-253-2200
> 
> ---Original Message---
> 
> From: Jonathan Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: FileMaker Pro Discussions <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:59:56 -0400
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [TEST REQUEST] FileMaker Accounting
> 
> I'm sorry. I thought that your solution was meant to work closely with other solutions. Integrating an accounting module into, say, an order and inventory system, would be to "bolt it on."
> 
> Sorry to be confusing.

--
Jonathan Fletcher
FileMaker 9 & 10 Certified Developer

Fletcher Data Consulting
[log in to unmask]
http://www.fletcherdata.com
502-509-7137

Kentuckiana's FileMaker Users Group
Next meeting: April 26, 12:00 pm to 3:00-ish
Listserv signup: http://fmpug.com/mailman/listinfo/louisville_fmpug.com
Blog: http://www.kyfmp.com